Australia ends ban on human cloning...Good idea? Your thoughts.? - arthritis of spinal cord pictures
Australia Lifts Ban on Human Cloning
CANBERRA, Australia legalized (December 6) - Australia, the cloning of human embryos for stem cell research is repealed by a vote by the House of Representatives Wednesday that a four-year ban on the procedure.
The Parliament of Australia, the first laws on stem cell research in 2002, allowing scientists to extract stem cells from surplus embryos for in vitro fertilization but preventing single cell cloning.
The law passed Wednesday allows therapeutic cloning to produce the splicing of skin cells with eggs, stem cells, also known as master cells, which are suitable for the formation of all tissues of the human body are known.
Scientists hope that research on stem cells ultimately lead to therapies for diseases like Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and spinal cord injuries, diabetes and arthritis.
Opponents say the law does not promote the scientific evidence that does not respect the fundamental rights of the unborn.
Is this a good idea? In the case of the United States do the same
Monday, February 8, 2010
Arthritis Of Spinal Cord Pictures Australia Ends Ban On Human Cloning...Good Idea? Your Thoughts.?
3 comments:
Here is my homecoming. If you think in vitro fertilization, you will find that these eggs, which are still never produced children first. Therefore, all "babies can" would not exist, the "dead". In essence, the "baby" should be created "master" cells to leave "issue would go far enough unnatural.
I believe that the Government of Australia has the right, by you not accept that the real cloning, my way of thinking, opens a Pandora's box. But I think it is to decide a question for the American people, not scientists, not the government - is a moral problem, because many people.
BTW, I am condemned to life imprisonment the right, but see no conflict in my mind about stem cell research.
Yes, I think it's a good idea, and the United States should also do. Stem cell research can save lives and I personally believe a few hundred large-cell embryo is a life.
I think it's a wonderful idea. I do not understand how people say that it is not the rights of the unborn child, because they supernumerary embryos that have already retired are used. I do not know how about you, but if it is possible to publish my embryo or used to help someone, I would choose the later. The fact that she now does not mean using human cells and that we imply a step closer to being able to man by which this article appears to be cloned, too. There are a lot of information about the human genome is still unknown and probably not in the coming years and we know until now is not the cloning of a human being to be possible. It's like trying a new look at a 1000 piece puzzle blindfolded in relation to the situation, all of them. We are still blindfolded when it comes to understanding the human genome.
Post a Comment